Lilli Tagger vs Lois Boisson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Mar at 11:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Tagger vs L. Boisson

 AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tagger 1 - 0 Boisson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lilli Tagger winning 2 and Lois Boisson winning 0. The last match between Lilli Tagger and Lois Boisson was at the W35 Terrassa, 29-03-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Lilli Tagger getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Tagger | 1 | 
| Boisson | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) W35 Terrassa(03-29-25)
L. Tagger vs L. Boisson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $826,889 | 
| 67.05% (59-29) | Career Total W/L | 62.93% (146-86) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 3 | Titles | 8 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 100.00% (3-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 70.00% (14-6) | 
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 | 
L. Tagger vs L. Boisson Match Preview:
In a world where tennis balls fly like enthusiastic popcorns at a matinee, and players twist like pretzels on a hot summer day, we're tasked with deciphering the potential winner of this epic showdown. Tagger and Boisson, our courageous contenders, bring their own distinctive flavors to the court. Tagger, whose second serve points are nabbed like freshly baked bread at 41.33%, must reckon with Boisson's slightly less enticing 35.98% offering. It's as if Boisson misplaced a key ingredient in their second-serving recipe, leaving it a tad less appealing.
Now, if you think serving is everything, well, return stats say otherwise. When opponents haphazardly fling their second serves, Boisson has been the vulture with a keen eye for gobbling them up 50.31% of the time. Not to be outdone, Tagger grabs those second-serve tidbits a respectable 45.34% of the time. On the first-serve return battlefield, however, Tagger seems to shine brighter with 36.09% compared to Boisson's 29.58%. One might say Tagger's returns are like top-tier salsa, bringing just the right amount of zing to the plate.
On the flip side, Boisson has seemingly mastered the Houdini act of escaping breakpoints, saving 54.9% while Tagger wiggles out of 51.5%. This peculiar stat might as well have 'come bet on me!' banners waving above it. Meanwhile, when it comes to overall matches, Boisson has been crafting wins like an artisanal bread maker, boasting an 80.77% success rate compared to Tagger's respectable 62.5%. Our baguette-making Boisson clearly knows how to knead out those victories.
When choosing a battlefield, both players find clay courts much to their liking. While Tagger's win percentage on clay is a polite nod at 58%, Boisson takes a commanding bow with a princely 71%. Meanwhile, the indoor hard courts seem like Boisson's kryptonite with a paltry 44%, whereas Tagger maintains a decent equilibrium with 50%. It's like the difference between acing a dance at a high school prom and tripping over shoelaces.
Peeking at the quality of opponents, Boisson has consistently faced some tough cookies, with their adversaries holding an average rank of 267.27 — much stiffer competition than Tagger's at 316.13. Factor the opponent into the equation, and it's like choosing between an appetizer and a main course.
When it boils down to nerve-wracking deciding sets, Boisson transforms into a veritable monster, grabbing 82% of these sets with teeth-baring ferocity, while Tagger's victory dance trails at 55%. As for breakpoints, Tagger has that well-practiced lunge and converts them 36.75% of the time, while Boisson takes a more cavalier approach, converting 29.73%. When these numbers dance across our spreadsheets, Tagger might just edge out on clay.
Considering all these delicious statistics bouncing off the page, Boisson appears as the ingredient-rich soufflé more likely to rise and win. Nevertheless, in tennis, much like life, surprises are always lurking just around the net's corner. But hey, aren't they half the fun?
Lilli Tagger vs Lois Boisson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Tagger vs L. Boisson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 13 | Games Won | 9 | 
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 | 
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 | 
| 1:57:2 | Average Match Time | 1:57:2 | 
| 70% (55/79) | 1st Serve % | 59% (39/66) | 
| 67% (37/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) | 
| 46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) | 
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 23% (3/13) | 
| 48% (32/66) | Return Points Win % | 39% (31/79) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
L. Tagger Recent Matches Played
L. Boisson Recent Matches Played

L. Tagger vs L. Boisson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.05% (59/29) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.93% (146/86) | 
| 63.96% (126/71) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.56% (318/225) | 
| 54.95% (977/801) | Games Win/Loss | 54.25% (2689/2268) | 
| 61.11% (11/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (14/14) | 
| 70.31% (45/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 71.90% (110/43) | 
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.00% (22/28) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 | 
| 133 | Aces Total | 659 | 
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 | 
| 229 | Total Double Faults | 921 | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:32:35 | 
| 322.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 369.65 | 
| 64% (3194/4955) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9055/14719) | 
| 62% (1992/3194) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (5981/9055) | 
| 49% (858/1761) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2560/5665) | 
| 49% (299/616) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (863/1752) | 
| 46% (2273/4945) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6528/14273) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (6/6) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (2/1) | 
| 75.00% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 58.33% (7/5) | 
| 69.84% (44/19) | Challenger W/L | 63.64% (105/60) | 
| 60.00% (12/8) | Futures W/L | 65.00% (26/14) | 
| 67% (58/87) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (143/228) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 60% (9/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (20/42) | 
| 59% (13/22) | Deciding Set Win % | 66% (53/80) | 
| 91% (58/53) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (138/123) | 
| 9% (58/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (138/14) | 
| 20% (30/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (94/23) | 












